Best birds and DNA testing resource on the web


Evolution: Trouble Times Four

Bombardier  Beetlearrange a series of compound eyes from
different creatures which they claim show the
One of life's little riddles is theevolutionary steps leading up to the human
bombardier beetle. As far as evolution iseye.
concerned, it's a tough nut to crack. This
small insect has a very imposing chemicalWhat's wrong with the evolutionist's story?
defense system. When threatened, it aims it'sQuite a bit. The speculation about a gradual
two abdomen tubes at its adversary, often anmutation-led construction of the eye is just
ant or spider. Then the bombardier fires offthat - speculation. There are no partially
a series of miniature explosions pepperingformed eyes in the fossil record. Different
its victim with boiling acid. It is quitetypes of eyes? Yes,. But they are all
effective  at  keeping  predators  at  bay.complete, fully functional systems with every
component  in  place  and  accounted  for.
What makes it work? The defense weapon is
made of two storage glands, a combustionFurthermore, the eye by itself does not give
chamber, a couple of machine-gun type ofus vision. The optic nerve, the thalamus, and
swivel tubes, and of course the bombardier'sa series of nerves linking the eye to the
expertise and instinct for using it. Thebrain are all required. And there's more. The
chemicals are stored separately and arebrain has a primary visual cortex and a
combined  when  used.visual association cortex set up to decode
and  interpret  the  incoming  information.
When combined, the toxic mixture is 25
percent hydrogen peroxide, 10 percentSee how complex it is? The eye, the optic
hydroquinone, water, and free oxygen plusnerve, the thalamus, the nerve network, and
enzymes which detonate the explosion. Ofthe brain's visual processing centers all had
course, all of these chemicals must beto be in place and fully operational before
stored, combined, and used in the rightsight  was  possible.
places, amounts, and concentrations.
Otherwise, this little bug could easily blowHow do evolutionists account for these extra
itself into extinction or boil itself alive.components in our visual system? They don't.
The fact that it doesn't do either shows howThey ignore them. Evolutionists can only say,
well  this  insect  is  put  together."Mistake after mistake in the DNA must have
produced these essential ingredients."
The bombardier controls, aims, and fires itsIncremental evolutionary steps is not a
chemical weapon through a series ofreasonable explanation for sight.
specialized nerves and muscles. Each rapidFurthermore, observation and dissection of
explosion is heard as a "pop." Oxygen spewsplants and animals have not revealed any
out a hot jet of steam and quinone solutiondeveloping incomplete organ of any type
under high pressure. It is a well-coordinatedpresently in nature. And the fossil record
delivery system for firing droplets ofhas yet to show any developing, incomplete
boiling, burning acid at anyone who daresorgan  of  any  type  in  the  past.
bother  the  bombardier  beetle.
Color  Vision
How did such an elaborate defense system come
about? Every minute detail of it had to beColor vision, says biologist Michael Pitman
programmed  in  the  DNA.in his book Adam and Evolution, presents yet
another problem for the evolutionists. Most
Consider what is involved here: Storagecreatures don't have it. Only several bony
compartments, combination chamber, separatefishes, reptiles, birds, bees plus other
chemicals and enzymes, the intake of exactassorted insects, and primates see in color.
amounts of water and oxygen, plus hundreds ofYes, that does leave out other mammals such
nerves, muscles, and fibers intricately wovenas cats, dogs, horses, and bulls, all of
into a working system. All of these items arewhich see in black, white, and shades of
coded and integrated into the bombardier'sgray.
DNA.
That's just an interesting quirk of nature
To say that this extraordinary defense systemunless, of course, you are a protozoa-to-man
resulted from a series of errors is not aevolutionist. Then you have a problem. You
reasonable conclusion. It's on the same levelfind yourself defending the following
as saying a jig-saw puzzle of a thousandproposition: Fish evolved retinal cones
pieces happened, by sheer accident, to fitallowing  color  vision.
together perfectly forming a complete mosaic.
Evolving into amphibians, color vision was
That's asking too much of an accident or anysomehow lost, only to resurface (maybe we
series of accidents. Someone withshould call it re-evolve) in certain birds
intelligence put the puzzle together;and related reptiles. But when it came to
likewise, Someone with intelligence putmammals color vision was lost again. However,
together  the  bombardier  beetle.color vision did another about-face and
reemerged in primates. How's that for a
There is another reason for doubting thetwisted  story?
evolution of such a complex defense system.
Predators would not have allowed it. Can youTwo  Eyes  Standard
imagine ants, spiders, and praying mantis
idly standing by for millions of yearsIf you were to line up every amphibian,
patiently waiting for mutations to graduallyreptile, bird, and mammal, and look each one
perfect  the  bombardier's  defense?  No?squarely in the face, what would you see?
About the same as you see when you look at
Given the opportunity, you can be sure,your own reflection in the mirror. You find a
predators would have devoured this otherwisebalanced symmetrical face: two ears - one on
helpless little bug into extinction. Thus weeach side, two eyes overlooking a single nose
are compelled to say, the bombardier'sin the center with a mouth directly below.
chemical defense system in all of itsSpecies after species fit that general
complexity had to come onboard, intact as adescription including the vast majority of
single  unit.  It  was  designed.fish  too.
Millipede  Apheloria  CorrugataBut why two eyes? Evolutionists have an
answer: "Three dimensional vision was
What's true of the bombardier is also true ofessential for our ancestors swinging through
the millipede Apheloria corrugata who shootsthe trees." Using our imagination, we can see
hydrogen cyanide at its enemies. Againluckless one-eyed primates banging into trees
incremental steps are not practical. The onlydue  to  their  lack  of  depth  perception.
reasonable explanation for these complex,
integrated chemical defenses is design -With their extinction only the two-eyed types
design by Someone with an in-depth knowledgewere left to carry on. Even if we accept
of physics, chemistry, biology, andnatural selection's bias against one-eyed
microbiology.tree swingers, that still does not explain
all of those other two-eyed amphibians,
Darwin  Quote  on  Eye  and Natural Selectionreptiles, birds, mammals, and fish who never
had  to  contend  with  tree  swinging.
Next let's consider the eye. Here is where
the rubber meets the road. This is the acidFor all practical purposes, one eye should
test for evolution. Darwin recognized thesuffice. Think of all it takes to make one
problem and mentioned it in the Origin of theeye work. Well over a hundred million
Species: "To suppose that the eye with allindividual parts must work in unison - with
its inimitable contrivances for adjusting theeach other and with a nerve network and a
focus to different distances, for admittingspecialized optic nerve section of the brain.
different amounts of light, and forWhen the whole system is in gear and
correction of spherical and chromaticproducing  -  you  have  vision.
aberration, could have formed by natural
selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd inIt's next to impossible to see how
the  highest  degree."evolution's haphazard errors could ever
accidentally conjure up one eye. Even so,
Who  can  argue  with  that?that's far more feasible than two eyes
emerging from such a questionable source.
VisionOne-eyed creatures, however, are nowhere to
be  found  -  in or out of the fossil record.
This is what we know about human vision:
Light enters the eye through the transparentOf course two eyes are better than one. They
window called the cornea which covers thecover a wider territory, and you have a
pupil. The pupil is an opening in the iris,built-in spare should one go bad. Depth
the colored part of the eye. Light continuesperception does assist predators in
through the aqueous humor, a waterypinpointing their prey, and it helps the prey
substance, until it lands upon the lens. Theto avoid the predators. But if we start
lens in turn focuses the light on the retina.considering evolutionary advantages, why not
three eyes instead of two? Wouldn't that be
On the way to the retina, light must traveleven better? Sure, why not four or five eyes
through the vitreous humor, a transparentwhile  we  are  at  it?
jelly which fills out the center of the eye,
helping it to keep its shape. When light hitsAnd how many times has a predator slipped up
the retina, it stimulates up to 137 millionon the back of as unsuspecting prey? If the
specialized cells know as rods and cones.prey had an eye or two in the back of its
(Cones are the color detectors; rods are thehead, wouldn't it be a leg up in the
black  and  white  detectors.)evolutionary  sweepstakes?
Both rods and cones are chemical switchYet no amphibian, reptile, bird or mammal has
receptors. Light triggers these miniatureopted for either the evolutionary shortcut of
on-off buttons generating as estimated onea single eye or the evolutionary advantage of
billion nerve impulses per second. The massmore  than  two  eyes.
of electrical impulses is forwarded to the
cerebral cortex via the optic nerve and aIf the only thing at work here is random,
complex  nerve  network.haphazard, off-the-wall mutations, those
persistent two-eyed creatures extending back
The cerebral cortex is equipped with a visualmillions of years make no sense at all. On
processing center which integrates data fromthe other hand, if those amphibians,
both eyes and inverts the upside down image.reptiles, birds, and mammals were designed,
That provides us with our three-dimensionalthere is a logical explanation for the
right-side-up picture. Exactly how the brainconsistent pattern. The designer liked the
interprets those electrical impulses andtwo ears, two eyes, single nose and mouth
turns them into a picture is still a mystery.look.  And  that's  the  way  he  made  them.
Eye  Components  and  FunctionsEar  Components  and  Functions
Just how complicated is the eye? Each humanTurning our attention to the ear, we find a
eye contains over 137 million essentialrepeat of the eye story. The characters are
working parts. Can you imagine a machine thatdifferent, but the theme is the same. The
complex? Let's take a look at some of theseouter ear, ear canal, eardrum, eustachian
components  and  their  functions.tube, hammer, anvil, stirrup, cochlea,
cochlear nerve, and the auditory center of
The outside layer is called the scleroticthe temporal lobe - all work in harmony for a
layer. It's white, semi-rigid, and gives thecommon purpose. Actually, ears serve two
eyeball its basic shape and provides apurposes:  hearing  and  balance.
measure  of  protection  as  well.
Here is how the ear works: The outer ear
The middle layer is called the choroid layer.collects sound and funnels it into a one-inch
It's a dark pigment containing numerous bloodirregularly shaped ear canal. The canal acts
vessels. Its job is to prevent light fromas a filter. Numerous hairs plus four
reflecting  within  the  eye.thousand wax-producing glands keep out
foreign particles and provides a constant
The inner layer is called the retina. Itmoist temperature for the delicate middle and
contains 130 million rods which see in blackinner  ear.
and shades of gray, and 7 million cones which
provide sharp, clear color vision. Each coneThe eardrum is located at the end of the ear
is sensitive to only color: red, green, orcanal. Sound vibrations are passed from the
blue light. Rods and cones are actuallyeardrum to a trio of linked bones in the
photoreceptor cells connected to sensorymiddle ear. They are named for their shapes:
neurons. The retina changes light intothe hammer, anvil, and stirrup. These three
electrical  nerve  impulses.tiny bones amplify the sound into the inner
ear. Air pressure is equalized on either side
Conjunctiva - A mucous membrane which linesof the eardrum by a vent leading from the
the inner surface of the eyelid and themiddle ear to the throat. It's called the
exposed surface of the eye and lubricateseustachian  tube.
both.
In the inner ear, we find what appears to be
Cornea - A uniformly thick, transparenta small snail shell. This little device is
nearly circular disc covering the lens. Itthe cochlea. The cochlea is only about the
serves as a window letting light into thesize of a hazelnut, but it has a big job. It
eye,  and  it  also  protects  the  lens.is usually compared to one of two things.
Some say it is similar to a telephone system
Aqueous humor - A clear, lymph-like fluidwith enough circuits to service a good-sized
between  the  cornea  and  lens.city.
Iris- The color-pigmented membrane separatingOthers liken the cochlea to a piano keyboard
the cornea from the lens. It adjusts the sizewith twenty thousand or so different keys.
of the pupil regulating the amount of lightEither way, you get the idea; it is a very
admitted  to  the  eye.small  but extraordinarily complex structure.
Pupil - The black circular hole through whichIncoming sound frequencies which have been
light  enters  the  eye.amplified by the hammer-anvil-stirrup
combination, vibrate hair-like sensory cells
Ciliary muscles - Controls the shape of thein the cochlea. The cochlea's job is to
iris which in turn adjusts the size of thetranslate sound waves into nerve impulses.
pupil.Varying sound frequencies strike different
sections of the sensory cells in numerous
Lens - A transparent part of the eye thatcombinations. Nerve impulses travel from the
focuses light to form an image of the retina.cochlea on to the auditory nerve and on into
the  brain.  And  that  is  what  we  hear.
Vitreous humor - The transparent substance
which  fills  the  eye.Once again we see an organ which has all the
appearances of design. It takes a great leap
Eye muscles - Six muscles attached to the eyeof faith to claim it is an accumulation of
which  provide  movement.DNA errors. There is no evidence for such a
claim nor facts to support it. The only
Tear ducts and glands - A system forreasonable conclusion is that Someone with a
lubricating  and  protecting  the  eye.good solid knowledge of physics, biology, and
micro-technology designed and made this
The  eye  also  has  a  few  accessories:complex,  intricate,  and  delicate  organ.
Eyelashes and eyebrows - Both assist inAnalogies  and  Conclusion
keeping out debris. Each serves as a defense
mechanism  for  the  eye.Have you ever seen a cornfield? A cornfield
is nothing but acre after acre of cornstalks
That is a remarkable number of parts workingall about the same height, all in neat rows
together for a common purpose. Don't forgetwith little on no grass between. After seeing
that each of these items must be coded intoa cornfield, it would never occur to you that
the DNA at its appropriate location tothe whole thing could be an accident. Nature
integrate and coordinate with all the otherjust doesn't do that sort of thing. Someone
eye features. It has all the appearances ofcleared  the  ground  and  planted the seeds.
design. It's difficult to see how it could be
anything else. The same thought occurred toLet's try another example. On either side of
Charles Darwin. The eye "with all of itsthe road you notice a row of evenly spaced
inimitable contrivances" gave him seconddogwood trees. And each tree is circled by a
thoughts  about his natural selection theory.single row of flowers. No one needs to tell
you that somebody purposely planted those
Television  Analogytrees  and  flowers.
Have you ever looked inside of a televisionWe know that Mount Rushmore bears the
set? Inside you find a number of panels withlikenesses of four U.S. presidents. If your
numerous miniature parts seemingly all mixedgeography teacher were to tell you that those
together in a hodge-podge collection. Butheads of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, and
that is not really the case. Those panelsRoosevelt were accidentally formed by natural
are circuit boards. And on those circuiterosion, would you believe it? If your
boards are carefully positioned transistors,English teacher were to tell you the first
capacitors, resistors, conductors,unabridged English dictionary resulted from
transformers, and other electronic parts allan accidental explosion in a print shop,
creating  an  image  on  the  picture  tube.would  you  laugh?
Each tiny part is exactly the correct type,Nature is not neat. It's not symmetrical; nor
size, and strength needed for that particularis it artistic or creative. No, it is just
spot on the circuit board. If anything is outthe opposite -- disorganized, erratic, and
of line, chances are you will not get achaotic. You and I know if nature is left to
picture. Just as in the eye, all parts areits own devices, it will grow an irregular
essential.assortment of weeds, but not a neat row of
crops. It will grow an odd collection of
We know that television didn't just happen.various trees scattered hither, thither, and
It took some intelligent people a good numberyon, but not evenly spaced dogwoods with a
of years to figure out the technology and putsingle  row  of  flowers  circling  each.
it into place. The eye is considerably more
complicated than any TV. It has far moreErosion will create ugly gashes in hillsides,
parts to harmonize than even the mostbut it won't carve statues of presidents out
expensive television set. All indications areof rock. An explosion can blow a print shop
that the human eye was put together byto smithereens, but it is not going to create
Someone whose intelligence and technology area dictionary. Nature doesn't build things up;
vastly superior to our own. In Origin of theit doesn't create patterns; and it doesn't
Species,  Charles  Darwin  seems  to  agree.produce  complex  designs.
Evolutionists'  Explanation  for  VisionNature did not create the bombardier's
chemical defense system, nor the millipede's
How do evolutionists account for eyesight?hydrogen cyanide system, nor the human eye or
They believe that the eye began as aear. Nor did nature create the extraordinary
light-sensitive spot on a cell. Step-by-step,computer called the brain, whose operation is
random mutation after mutation,still beyond our full understanding. The only
light-sensitive cells folded inward to form alogical explanation is that each was
retina. Somehow mutations made the skin ondesigned. And where we find such clear
the surface transparent, part of which turnedevidence of design, it's reasonable to assume
into a lens focusing light on the newlya  Designer.
formed  retina.
Speaking in vague generalities, evolution
Again, random mistake after mistake afteroften seems plausible. But getting down to
mistake added parts to the eye which in timethe nitty-gritty of specific organs such as
became the fully functional, complex,eyes and ears, we find evolution an
detailed organ we have today. Evolutionistsinadequate and impractical answer.



1 A B 25 26 27 28 29 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80